A brilliant writer, James Delingpole at Breitbart News took apart Obama's climate change chant at UC Irvine last week.
Obama opened with, "I'm not a scientist." which was the only accurate statement of the speech. So why did Obama continue anyway?
"I do know the overwhelming majority of scientists who work on climate change, including some who once disputed the data, have put the debate to rest." Wrong. Obama simply repeats the multiply discredited "97 per cent" consensus meme.
"Today's Congress is full of folks who stubbornly and automatically reject the scientific evidence." True. Democrats carrying water for the cult group reject overwhelming evidence there's been no warming since 1997.
"They will tell you climate change is a hoax or fad." The 'they' here are those who accept the current data objectively and agree the planet is cooling, not warming.
“When President Kennedy set us on a course to the moon...I don’t remember anybody saying the moon wasn’t there or that it was made of cheese.” This is 'grade school level logical fallacy.' Kennedy's moon landing, ironically, was an exercise in real science - nothing like the fake climate models built on manipulated data.
True, Obama and those like him have no case. And that's a big problem given he has so much power and pretends that he does.
